December 4, 2015 at 7:50 pm (African National Congress, America, ANC, Anti-Austerity, Anti-Austerity UK Alliance, Austerity, BRICS, Cultural Revolution, Deconstructon, Deleuze, Democratic Community, Derrida, Human Rights, IMF, SACP, Socrates, Uncategorized, Zuma)
Tags: America, American Hegemony, ANC, Austerity, BRICS, COSATU, Financial Control, IMF, Jacob Zuma, SACP, South Africa, World Bank
Fifty Shades of the IMF
America and the Empire of Dominance
The BRICS Alternative and the Case of South Africa
Narcissism, not wisdom, guides American policy, which is itself a mask of anarchy.
Unlike the General Assembly of the United Nations, where each country has one vote, decision making at the IMF was designed to reflect the relative positions of its member countries in the global economy. The IMF continues to undertake reforms to ensure that its governance structure adequately reflects fundamental changes taking place in the world economy.
The International Monetary Fund
The economic health of every country is a proper matter of concern to all its neighbours, near and far.
President Franklin Roosevelt
As with De Sade’s Justine, the IMF lures its victims with pledges of aid.
Again and again, the naive girl, still believing in virtue, finds herself imprisoned. Such was the case, for instance, with the abbey in the forest, inhabited by monks. Justine is saved, she believes – but the monks reveal themselves to be sadists, torturing, raping and killing their prey. The monks, hiding behind a mask of sanctity, do what they like, satisfy their peculiar and perverse desires, while disciplining and binding those they have abducted (ab ducere, to lead from, astray). The monks wait for their quarry as a spider who strikes. But, as with the carnivorous plant that seems to offer water, the monks contrive to bind Justine even as they extend a helping hand. Thomas Jefferson, writing in the same era, warned, ‘…under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep. I do not exaggerate.’
To read the rest of the essay, please visit Fifty Shades of the IMF: America and the Empire of Dominance
March 31, 2015 at 1:56 am (Angel Merkel, Anti-Austerity, Bataille, Campaign For Nuclear Disarmament, China, Chomsky, Creativity, Cultural Sustainability, deconstruction, Democratic Community, European Democracy, European Union, Germany, IMF, NATO, Podemos, Syriza)
Tags: America, American Hegemony, Angela Merkel, Anti-Austerity Movement, European Democracy, European Left, European Sovereignty, Germany, Hegemon, IMF, NATO, Neo-Liberalism, Spiegel, The Fourth Reich
Published 8 April 2015 in Daily Wales: News for a Sovereign Nation
The Fourth Reich
American Hegemony and the Question of European Democracy
Europe is an invalid who owes her best thanks to her incurability and the eternal transformations of her sufferings; these constant new situations, these equally constant new dangers, pains, and make-shifts, have at last generated an intellectual sensitiveness which is almost equal to genius, and is in any case the mother of all genius.
Nietzsche, The Gay Science, Book 1, Section 24 
In a recent article in Spiegel, “The Fourth Reich: What Some Europeans See When They Look at Germany” , attributed to Spiegel Staff (Nikolaus Blome, Sven Böll, Katrin Kuntz, Dirk Kurbjuweit, Walter Mayr, Mathieu von Rohr, Christoph Scheuermann, Christoph Schult), a stunning admission was repeated, in which Angela Merkel laments, defiantly, ‘I am rather alone in the EU, but I don’t care. I am right.’ The article claims her lament was shared with ‘a small group of advisers during a discussion about the role of the IMF.’ The article continues: ‘Later, she said: “We are in Europe what the Americans are in the world: the unloved leading power.”’
The article offers context for the current situation of Europe, arising at the end of WWII:
After the end of the Third Reich, German dominance on the Continent appeared to have been rendered an impossibility for all time. West Germany and East Germany both were initially tentative states that more or less willingly subordinated themselves to their big brothers, the US and the Soviet Union. They ceded to the dominance of others.
The rehearsal of the historical context of the current situation culminates in the fateful question: ‘Which is why the “German question” has returned. Is the new Germany too big and powerful for the other European countries or is it too small and hesitant?’
To read the rest, please visit The Fourth Reich: American Hegemony and the Question of European Democracy