November 13, 2016 at 8:35 pm (National Security, Trump, Uncategorized)
Tags: Europe, IMF, National Security, NATO, Putin, Russia, Trump, WTO
Trump has however won the election and he is on a direct collision course with the National Security establishment. Of course, Trump is an unlikely revolutionary. He has never said he would defy the National Security Act of 1947 (no president has), which means that he will accept its shadowy apparatus and its bureaucratic methodologies. Indeed, he supports increased NSA surveillance, expanded military spending, CIA activism, FBI phone hacking, etcetera. He is simply suggesting a different target for business-as-usual, by reminding us of our last propaganda cycle, the “War on Terror”.
Yet, Trump has thus far failed to articulate the “big picture” of a Russian rapprochement in the context of the necessity of a US glasnost – of a deconstruction of the National Security state. During a campaign characterised by serial violations of longstanding taboos (Sanders’ opposition to the CIA, his support of the Sandinistas and Cuba) and Wikileaks’ disclosure of sensitive and damaging government and campaign documents, Trump squandered his opportunity to lay out a credible vision for either radical reform or revolution. Indeed, he has been happy to simultaneously endorse the NSA surveillance state and Wikileaks – and without irony.
Trump’s has thus far failed to articulate a coherent vision of a cooperative, multi-polar world – in other words, to invite ordinary citizens to demand a radical change in the concept of national security and of the place of the US in the world. If he does not challenge the NSC, Trump’s insurgency will expose itself as a distraction to the urgent task of finding a pathway out of the labyrinth of empire. In its naivety, Trump’s “revolution” would then serve to further merely consolidate the unquestioned impunity of the National Security state.
To read the complete essay, please visit Trump vs. the National Security Establishment.
March 20, 2016 at 5:30 am (Aesthetics, America, International Law, Syria, Uncategorized)
Tags: Assad, European Union, France, Hezbollah, International Law, Iran, Iraq, Israel, NATO, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Syria, TeleSUR, TeleSURtv, Turkey, UAE, United Kingdom, United Nations, United Nations Security Council, United States, UNSC
DAMASCUS, SYRIA – JANUARY 31: In this handout provided by the United Nation Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), Residents wait in line to receive food aid distributed in the Yarmouk refugee camp on January 31, 2014 in Damascus, Syria. The United Nations renewed calls for the Syria regime and rebels to allow food and medical aid into the Palestinian camp of Yarmouk. An estimated 18,000 people are besieged inside the camp as the conflict in Syria continues. (Photo by United Nation Relief and Works Agency via Getty Images)
December 2, 2015 at 6:24 pm (China, Chinese, Chinese New Left, Uncategorized, Western Politics)
Tags: Brazil, BRICS, Geopolitics, IMF, India, International Law, NATO, Obama, Putin, Russia, South Africa, Syria
May 18, 2015 at 10:07 pm (Anti-Austerity, Anti-Austerity UK Alliance, Bataille, British Politics, Cameron, Campaign For Nuclear Disarmament, Chomsky, Creativity, deconstruction, Deleuze, Democratic Community)
Tags: Anti-Austerity Movement, Anti-Austerity UK, Anti-Austerity UK Alliance, GMO, IMF, Labour Party, Michael Foot, NATO, TTIP, United Kingdom
The poetic cliché that “history repeats itself” has turned into parody and farce in the current leadership selection process in the Labour Party in which various right wing candidates, like brands of dish soap, vie against each other in a boring and meaningless spectacle.
This essay is published in Daily Wales: News for a Sovereign Nation, 19/05/2015
The parody and farce of the situation is manifest – a “Labour” Party in which the leadership selection process involves neither workers nor advocates of workers. The necessity of the intervention by Len McCluskey, a union leader, merely exacerbates the farce. But, no one in our corporate headline media will look at this process outside of the box.
The box is simply placed upon our heads and we are given a fait accompli which is a forced choice between different brands of the same corruption of the Labour Party. But, how many times have we been here before? The Left & the Right, the continuous and methodical divestment from the union movement and ordinary Labour Party members who are given the unenviable position of advocacy for something in which they no longer believe – all choice in politics becomes a forced choice if we do not have representation.
The current government has a mandate, an elective dictatorship for five years based upon 37% of the electoral vote. Very few of us were in any way involved in the selection processes of the leaders and thus our votes are merely a rubber stamping process, the criterion for which is an impressionistic sensibility disseminated by the information industrial complex.
Vague impressions, innuendo, brother stabs brother in the back, sick child, archetypes, corporate control, the manufacturing of control through distraction and superficiality. The problem is that we as humans in post-modern society live in a world of poetic clichés, inside a mythology of ghosts and innuendo. Old Labour, New Labour – clichés, stereotypes, misunderstandings, distortions and lost/missed opportunities.
The Left has never been given a chance, except for the catastrophe of 1983. But, in itself, the loss of Michael Foot means nothing. Should we talk about the interference in Wilson’s Labour government by the United States and the subservience of the United Kingdom to America ever since? Or, is that not allowed, outside of the box, extremist propaganda. But, outside the box is the truth, the perspective to see things as they are.
To read the rest of the article, please visit Give the Left a Chance.
March 31, 2015 at 1:56 am (Angel Merkel, Anti-Austerity, Bataille, Campaign For Nuclear Disarmament, China, Chomsky, Creativity, Cultural Sustainability, deconstruction, Democratic Community, European Democracy, European Union, Germany, IMF, NATO, Podemos, Syriza)
Tags: America, American Hegemony, Angela Merkel, Anti-Austerity Movement, European Democracy, European Left, European Sovereignty, Germany, Hegemon, IMF, NATO, Neo-Liberalism, Spiegel, The Fourth Reich
Published 8 April 2015 in Daily Wales: News for a Sovereign Nation
The Fourth Reich
American Hegemony and the Question of European Democracy
Europe is an invalid who owes her best thanks to her incurability and the eternal transformations of her sufferings; these constant new situations, these equally constant new dangers, pains, and make-shifts, have at last generated an intellectual sensitiveness which is almost equal to genius, and is in any case the mother of all genius.
Nietzsche, The Gay Science, Book 1, Section 24 
In a recent article in Spiegel, “The Fourth Reich: What Some Europeans See When They Look at Germany” , attributed to Spiegel Staff (Nikolaus Blome, Sven Böll, Katrin Kuntz, Dirk Kurbjuweit, Walter Mayr, Mathieu von Rohr, Christoph Scheuermann, Christoph Schult), a stunning admission was repeated, in which Angela Merkel laments, defiantly, ‘I am rather alone in the EU, but I don’t care. I am right.’ The article claims her lament was shared with ‘a small group of advisers during a discussion about the role of the IMF.’ The article continues: ‘Later, she said: “We are in Europe what the Americans are in the world: the unloved leading power.”’
The article offers context for the current situation of Europe, arising at the end of WWII:
After the end of the Third Reich, German dominance on the Continent appeared to have been rendered an impossibility for all time. West Germany and East Germany both were initially tentative states that more or less willingly subordinated themselves to their big brothers, the US and the Soviet Union. They ceded to the dominance of others.
The rehearsal of the historical context of the current situation culminates in the fateful question: ‘Which is why the “German question” has returned. Is the new Germany too big and powerful for the other European countries or is it too small and hesitant?’
To read the rest, please visit The Fourth Reich: American Hegemony and the Question of European Democracy
February 19, 2015 at 2:54 am (Anti-Austerity, Banks, Bataille, BBC Leaders Debates, Cameron, Creativity, Cultural Sustainability, Death, deconstruction, Deleuze, Democratic Community, Europe, European Central Bank, European Commission, European Union, Finance Capitalism, freedom, Greece, Greek philosophy, IMF, NATO, Occupy Democracy, Occupy London, Occupy Wall Street, Open Rights, philosophy, Poetry, Scotland, Syriza, Thrasymachus, Troika, Wales, Wales and the European Union)
Tags: democracy, Drop the Debt, ECB, European Commision, Greece, IMF, Let Greece Breathe, NATO, Syriza, Troika
August 30, 2014 at 9:32 am (Cameron, Captivation, Coalition Government, Creativity, Cultural Sustainability, Death, deconstruction, Democratic Community, Europe, European Union, General Election 2015, Innovation, Open Rights, Sustainability, Uncategorized, Wales, Wales and the European Union, Welsh Development)
Tags: American Empire, American Hegemony, American Occupation of Europe, China, CND, European Federalism, Independent Europe, Militarism, NATO, NoToNato, Russia, Sovereignty, Stop the War Coalition, Ukraine
On 4-5 September, 60 world leaders, including Barack Obama, convened in Wales for the NATO Summit to plan their war on the world, the features of which being increased military spending and Operation Spearhead, a rapid attack force to be directed, in the first instance, at Russia.
Thousands of everyday concerned citizens from across Wales, the UK and the world met them to say No to Nato, an event organised by Stop the War Coalition and CND with the endorsement of over 100 organisations.
To read more about the Welsh protests against NATO, please visit No New Wars, No to NATO